Reuters – (3/24/13) Cypriot President Nicos Anastasiades held last-minute talks with international lenders on Sunday in an attempt to save the Mediterranean island from financial meltdown and possibly becoming the first country to leave the euro zone.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Kiss the European Union Goodbye
By Alan  Caruba
In Paris on October 15th, a group of finance ministers and central  bankers known as the G20, representing major nations, gave the European Union  until October 23red to find an answer to the financial crisises that are tearing  apart the EU and its monetary structure. 
Don’t hold your breath. If not  now, at least in the foreseeable future, the EU will collapse for the oldest  reason, national sovereignty and national self-interest.
If you visit  Wikipedia and enter “European  Wars”, it will kick out a list that’s several pages long in small print  starting with the Trojan Wars, 1193-1184 BC. The Romans conquered everyone for a  while. The Spanish tried to invade England. For a while Napoleon was invading  everyone. There were the hundred year wars, thirty year wars, and wars for the  hell of it. Suffice to say the Europeans have a long record of going to war with  one another.
World War One impoverished its participants and led to World  War Two. After the devastation of World War Two and with the threat of the  Soviet Union to the East, European leaders concluded that the only option to  avoid future wars or being overrun by the Russian bear was to form a kind of  United States of Europe.
In a newly  published book, “The End of the Euro”, subtitled “The uneasy future of the  European Union”, Dr. Johan Van Overtveldt, the editor-in-chief of Trends,  Belgium’s leading weekly on business and economics, takes us through the history  of the European Union and the creation of a common currency, the  euro.
For people like me who thank a merciful God that Internet banking  makes it possible to actually know my checking account balance, Overtveldt’s  book is both a blessing and a challenge because it deals with some very complex  issues of finance. He also provides some very useful history with which to  understand the past and predict the future.
My knowledge of history was  sufficient to have huge doubts about the formation of the European Union and it  looks like I am about to be borne out in my pessimism. “While efforts at  European integration have without question contributed to peace on the  continent,” Overtveldt points out, “at least three other factors are also at  play.”
“First, broader international cooperation and consultation” have  been the order of the day since the end of World War Two. “Second, the presence  of American troops throughout Europe, and certainly in Germany, helped maintain  the military status quo. Third, the sense during the Cold War of “a common,  non-democratic enemy increased cooperation and cohesion among Western European  nations.”
Then Overtveldt identifies the central weakness of the European  Union. “History teaches us that, in particular, the lack of real political union  is a major barrier to the durability of a monetary union and its single  currency.”
The problem of the EU and the euro “is the loss of an  independent monetary policy” because what works for Germany does not necessarily  work for France, Spain, Italy, and the other EU members. 
This has become  abundantly evident as Greece totters on default of its debts and the contagion  of a sovereign debt crisis threatens to spread. Simply said, the Germans are not  inclined to want to “bail out” the Greeks because the Germans have a wide  conservative streak when it comes to the conduct of their financial affairs  while the Greeks were inclined to fudge the books and run up a huge  debt.
In addition to Greece, Portugal and Ireland are likely to find that  they have no choice except to leave the EU and Spain, Italy, and Belgium have  their problems, too. For that matter, add France to the list.
The U.S.  financial crisis no doubt sped up the process, but our government bailed out the  banks for the simple reason there never was a choice not to. One or two big  investment banks were allowed to fail, others were forcibly merged, but a nation  without a functioning banking system is nothing but lines on a map.
In a  recent column by Patrick J. Buchanan, titled “Is the New World Order  unraveling?” he notes the rise of “economic nationalism” in Europe as well  as warning against the foolish American trend of signing away our sovereign  rights by joining globalist organizations from the United Nations to the World  Trade Organization, along with a slew of treaties and agreements. 
The  export of whole U.S. industries has been one result “while emerging powers like  China, India, and Brazil are demanding to be exempt from restrictions developed  countries seek to impose.” The world is a nasty place in which to live. The Moon  and other planets, however, are less habitable and do not have cable  TV.
As Americans vainly look to their Congress to redress its own  authorization of the spending excesses of present and past administrations, the  rest of the world, protected by our military strength and moral values, has  decided it no longer has to pay us the attention it did in former times.  
So we shall surely witness the end of the euro and the European Union as  that continent returns to its normal levels of national self-interest that one  might argue are not a bad thing in a competitive world. So long, of course, as  those nations do not decide to declare war on one another.
© Alan Caruba,  2011


No comments:
Post a Comment