A couple of great comments on Obama's use of military force

As seen in the comments on @Instapundit "We traded a cowboy for a rodeo clown in our presidents." And a thin-skinned rodeo clown at that,
— Brett Rogers (@beatcanvas) August 30, 2013



Also at @Instapundit "Why is that when Syrians kill Syrians it requires our military, but when Libyans killed Americans, it didn't?"
— Brett Rogers (@beatcanvas) August 30, 2013

Shabbat Shalom everyone.

Will the US attack Syria? Should it?

Will the United States of Obama attack Syria, which is an Arab Muslim country? Should it?

The views on this question are all over the map. In my view, whether Obama should attack depends on what he hopes to accomplish, whether he can accomplish it, and whether the price he will pay by attacking (or not attacking) is a price worth paying. I'll elaborate on that toward the end of this post, but

Krauthammer: Obama's incoherence has made the US irrelevant in the Middle East

Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer says that President Hussein Obama's incoherence has made the United States irrelevant in the Middle East.

“The only constant in all of this is Obama as a candidate, as a Senator,
decided we should be out of these wars, we should be out of the Middle
East, the tide of war is receding, he repeats it over and over again and
pretends it’s true,”